State v. Wright

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Wright

110 S.E. 927, 118 S.C. 496, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 34

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 25, 1922

Docket10818

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 927 (State v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wright, 110 S.E. 927, 118 S.C. 496, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 34 (S.C. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

A careful consideration of the testimony in this case, a review of which would accomplish no useful purpose, conr vinces us that the evidence of the defendant’s guilt was insufficient to justify the submission of the case to the jury, and that a verdict of not guilty should have been directed by the Court. The judgment of this Court is that the judgment be reversed, and that the case be remanded for the direction of a verdict of not guilty under Rule 27 (90 S. E., xii).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

A careful consideration of the testimony in this case, a review of which would accomplish no useful purpose, conr vinces us that the evidence of the defendant’s guilt was insufficient to justify the submission of the case to the jury, and that a verdict of not guilty should have been directed by the Court. The judgment of this Court is that the judgment be reversed, and that the case be remanded for the direction of a verdict of not guilty under Rule 27 (90 S. E., xii).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.E. 927, 118 S.C. 496, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wright-sc-1922.