State v. Wright

138 P.3d 899, 206 Or. App. 711, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 Or. App. 724
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 5, 2006·No. 0506-66075; A128910·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder, is unable to provide for her basic personal needs, and is a danger to herself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for her basic personal needs or is a danger to herself. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wright, 138 P.3d 899, 206 Or. App. 711, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 920 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

138 P.3d 899 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130