State v. Wright
This text of 69 P.3d 719 (State v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Halpern, Jr., on behalf of appellant, has filed a motion to set aside the Court’s decision dated March 27, 2003, and to file a substitute brief in the above case. Opposing counsel has not filed an objection.
Mr. Halpern has been retained by appellant to represent him for purposes of appeal. In light of this, Daniel O’Dell is relieved from representation. The motion to set aside the Court’s decision is allowed. The Court’s decision dated March 27, 2003, is vacated and supplemental briefing is allowed.
Appellant’s supplemental brief is due August 12, 2003. Respondent’s supplemental brief is due 49 days after appellant’s supplemental brief.
May 13, 2003 Date
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 P.3d 719, 187 Or. App. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wright-orctapp-2003.