State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Wright

69 P.3d 719, 187 Or. App. 764

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 Or. App. 297 →

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 27, 2003·No. No. 00417; CA A116170·Published

Opinion

John Halpern, Jr., on behalf of appellant, has filed a motion to set aside the Court’s decision dated March 27, 2003, and to file a substitute brief in the above case. Opposing counsel has not filed an objection.

Mr. Halpern has been retained by appellant to represent him for purposes of appeal. In light of this, Daniel O’Dell is relieved from representation. The motion to set aside the Court’s decision is allowed. The Court’s decision dated March 27, 2003, is vacated and supplemental briefing is allowed.

Appellant’s supplemental brief is due August 12, 2003. Respondent’s supplemental brief is due 49 days after appellant’s supplemental brief.

Mary J, Deits Chief Judge

May 13, 2003 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Halpern, Jr., on behalf of appellant, has filed a motion to set aside the Court’s decision dated March 27, 2003, and to file a substitute brief in the above case. Opposing counsel has not filed an objection.

Mr. Halpern has been retained by appellant to represent him for purposes of appeal. In light of this, Daniel O’Dell is relieved from representation. The motion to set aside the Court’s decision is allowed. The Court’s decision dated March 27, 2003, is vacated and supplemental briefing is allowed.

Appellant’s supplemental brief is due August 12, 2003. Respondent’s supplemental brief is due 49 days after appellant’s supplemental brief.

Mary J, Deits Chief Judge

May 13, 2003 Date

State v. Wright, 69 P.3d 719, 187 Or. App. 764 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

69 P.3d 719 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.