State v. Wright

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wright

783 N.E.2d 514, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1454

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 2003

Docket2002-0234

StatusPublished

This text of 783 N.E.2d 514 (State v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wright, 783 N.E.2d 514, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Washington App. No. 00CA39, 2001-Ohio-2473. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Washington County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellee and amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, for leave to participate in oral argument scheduled for February 25, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington App. No. 00CA39, 2001-Ohio-2473. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Washington County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellee and amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, for leave to participate in oral argument scheduled for February 25, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 N.E.2d 514, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wright-ohio-2003.