State v. Wright
139 S.E.2d 10, 263 N.C. 129, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 782
Opinion
The State’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict rendered. No error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a new trial has been shown.
We deem it inappropriate to include herein a recital of the sordid evidence revealed by the record.
The verdict and judgment are upheld on authority of S. v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wright, 139 S.E.2d 10, 263 N.C. 129, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 782 (N.C. 1964).
139 S.E.2d 10 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Stokes
163 S.E.2d 770 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Harward
142 S.E.2d 691 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)