State v. . Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Wright

49 N.C. 308

DecidedJune 5, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 49 N.C. 308 (State v. . Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Wright, 49 N.C. 308 (N.C. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Nash, C. J.

The defendant in this case is a free man of color. The indictment is substantially the same as in the case of Hopkins, ante 305. In the first count, the defendant is charged with selling and delivering to the slave, Sam, the property of Mrs. Barron, a quart of spirits ; and, in the second count, for giving the spirits. The facts of the case, though not exactly those set forth in the case of Hopkins, are sufficiently so to call for the same judgment. In the case sent up, his Honor states the first count was for delivering the spirits. The delivery to which the statute refers is a deliveiyas a gift. If there is no gift, there is no such delivery as brings the defendant within the operation of the statute. There certainly *309 was no sale by tbe defendant; nor was there, for the reasons mentioned in the case of Hopkins, any gift. From the manner in which the case is drawn np, it is evident that the main object was to obtain from this Court an opinion as to the correctness of the Court below, in the course pursued as to the verdict of the jury. 'Less attention, therefore, was paid by the Judge instating the facts as to the main subject; but, as before remarked, sufficient appears to satisfy ns that there was no breach of the law, as stated in the indictment.

It is net necessary, in the view we have taken of the case, to express an opinion upon the other question sent up.

The judgment below is reversed, and this opinion is to be certified to the Superior Court of Law of Perquimons County, that it may proceed to judgment according to law.

Pee Cubiam. ' Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash, C. J.

The defendant in this case is a free man of color. The indictment is substantially the same as in the case of Hopkins, ante 305. In the first count, the defendant is charged with selling and delivering to the slave, Sam, the property of Mrs. Barron, a quart of spirits ; and, in the second count, for giving the spirits. The facts of the case, though not exactly those set forth in the case of Hopkins, are sufficiently so to call for the same judgment. In the case sent up, his Honor states the first count was for delivering the spirits. The delivery to which the statute refers is a deliveiyas a gift. If there is no gift, there is no such delivery as brings the defendant within the operation of the statute. There certainly *309 was no sale by tbe defendant; nor was there, for the reasons mentioned in the case of Hopkins, any gift. From the manner in which the case is drawn np, it is evident that the main object was to obtain from this Court an opinion as to the correctness of the Court below, in the course pursued as to the verdict of the jury. 'Less attention, therefore, was paid by the Judge instating the facts as to the main subject; but, as before remarked, sufficient appears to satisfy ns that there was no breach of the law, as stated in the indictment.

It is net necessary, in the view we have taken of the case, to express an opinion upon the other question sent up.

The judgment below is reversed, and this opinion is to be certified to the Superior Court of Law of Perquimons County, that it may proceed to judgment according to law.

Pee Cubiam. ' Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 N.C. 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wright-nc-1857.