State v. Wright

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wright

48 S.W.3d 111, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1090, 2001 WL 710210

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 26, 2001

DocketNo. ED 77270

StatusPublished

This text of 48 S.W.3d 111 (State v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wright, 48 S.W.3d 111, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1090, 2001 WL 710210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Antonio McCown Wright, appeals his conviction for forgery in violation [112]*112of Section 570.090, RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutor to ask improper questions during voir dire. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not plainly err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Antonio McCown Wright, appeals his conviction for forgery in violation [112]*112of Section 570.090, RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutor to ask improper questions during voir dire. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not plainly err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 S.W.3d 111, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1090, 2001 WL 710210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wright-moctapp-2001.