State v. Wright
847 So. 2d 616, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9316, 2003 WL 21414293
This text of 847 So. 2d 616 (State v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Wright, 847 So. 2d 616, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9316, 2003 WL 21414293 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
The State appeals Phillip Wright’s sentence and argues that it is illegal because the trial court did not impose a three-year minimum mandatory sentence. We affirm Wright’s sentence based on the authority of Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with the Fourth and Fifth Districts’ cases with which we disagreed in Green. See id. at 755.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Green v. State
839 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
847 So. 2d 616, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9316, 2003 WL 21414293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wright-fladistctapp-2003.