State v. Wren

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wren

745 N.E.2d 435, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1022

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 2001

Docket01-630

StatusPublished

This text of 745 N.E.2d 435 (State v. Wren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wren, 745 N.E.2d 435, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1022 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Richland App. No. 96CA72. Appellant has filed amotion for delayed appeal of a decision of the Court of Appeals for Richland County denying his application for reopening. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. 11(2)(A)(4)(b) prescribes that the provision for delayed appeal does not apply to appeals involving postconviction relief, including appeals of applications for reopening brought pursuant to App.R. 26(B),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richland App. No. 96CA72. Appellant has filed amotion for delayed appeal of a decision of the Court of Appeals for Richland County denying his application for reopening. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. 11(2)(A)(4)(b) prescribes that the provision for delayed appeal does not apply to appeals involving postconviction relief, including appeals of applications for reopening brought pursuant to App.R. 26(B),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 N.E.2d 435, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wren-ohio-2001.