State v. Wren

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wren

848 S.W.2d 647, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 1993 WL 73963

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 1993·No. No. 61982·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of operating an unregistered motor vehicle in violation of § 301.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.1989. He was sentenced to one day in jail and fined $400, with credit allowed for jail time already served. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of operating an unregistered motor vehicle in violation of § 301.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.1989. He was sentenced to one day in jail and fined $400, with credit allowed for jail time already served. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Wren, 848 S.W.2d 647, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 1993 WL 73963 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

848 S.W.2d 647 (State v. Wren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.