State v. Wray

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Wray

27 S.W. 1100, 124 Mo. 542, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 317

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedNovember 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 27 S.W. 1100 (State v. Wray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wray, 27 S.W. 1100, 124 Mo. 542, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 317 (Mo. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

Indicted for grand larceny, the defendant was convicted of that ofíense and appeals to this court.

The indictment is sufficient. The evidence has been preserved in the bill of exceptions, but inasmuch as the motion for a new trial has not been preserved in the bill, nor preserved in the record and called for in the bill, the clerk being directed to copy the same, we can not look into any exceptions taken nor into the evidence adduced. R. S. 1889, sec. 2304; State v. Griffin, 98 Mo. 672.

As there is no error in the record proper, the judgment must be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI