State v. Worthington

367 S.E.2d 134, 322 N.C. 115
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 6, 1988·No. 108A88·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

367 S.E.2d 134 (1988)
322 N.C. 115

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Chester Don WORTHINGTON.

No. 108A88.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 1988.

Underwood & Leech, Greenville, for defendant.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to show a substantial constitutional question filed by The State, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 1988."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant for Writ of Supersedeas and Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 1988."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Worthington, 367 S.E.2d 134, 322 N.C. 115 (N.C. 1988).

367 S.E.2d 134 (State v. Worthington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mello
684 S.E.2d 477 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Stines
683 S.E.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Welling v. Walker
451 S.E.2d 329 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
Stutts v. Adair
380 S.E.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)