State v. Worthington

Connecticut Superior Court

State v. Worthington

1 Root 137

DecidedSeptember 15, 1789

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 137 (State v. Worthington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Worthington, 1 Root 137 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

RetüRN of auditors in an action of account. Bemonstrance -— That the auditors liad made a mistake, by charging the state a large sum in good money nominally, which was paid by said Worthington in depreciated bills. Objection was made as to any inquiry, respecting those facts; the court determined and did inquire of the auditors the principles upon which they made out the balance.

And said return was accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RetüRN of auditors in an action of account. Bemonstrance -— That the auditors liad made a mistake, by charging the state a large sum in good money nominally, which was paid by said Worthington in depreciated bills. Objection was made as to any inquiry, respecting those facts; the court determined and did inquire of the auditors the principles upon which they made out the balance.

And said return was accepted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-worthington-connsuperct-1789.