State v. Worthingham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Worthingham

112 N.W. 1142, 101 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 633

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 5, 1907

DocketNos. 15,302-(211)

StatusPublished

This text of 112 N.W. 1142 (State v. Worthingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Worthingham, 112 N.W. 1142, 101 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 633 (Mich. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of selling liquor without a license and appeals to this court from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only question is whether there was evidence sufficient to justify the conclusion of the court that the appellant was guilty. We have examined the record carefully and are satisfied that the court was right. The order is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of selling liquor without a license and appeals to this court from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only question is whether there was evidence sufficient to justify the conclusion of the court that the appellant was guilty. We have examined the record carefully and are satisfied that the court was right. The order is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 N.W. 1142, 101 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-worthingham-minn-1907.