State v. Worl

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Worl

553 S.W.2d 719, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2585

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 22, 1977

DocketNo. 10380

StatusPublished

This text of 553 S.W.2d 719 (State v. Worl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Worl, 553 S.W.2d 719, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2585 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Defendant William Marvin Worl was convicted by a Hickory County jury of possession of a firearm while intoxicated [§ 564.-610, RSMo 1969] and sentenced by the court to a three-year prison term.¹

We have reviewed the transcript and the briefs of the parties. The evidence in support of the jury’s verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b), V.A. M.R.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Defendant William Marvin Worl was convicted by a Hickory County jury of possession of a firearm while intoxicated [§ 564.-610, RSMo 1969] and sentenced by the court to a three-year prison term.¹

We have reviewed the transcript and the briefs of the parties. The evidence in support of the jury’s verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b), V.A. M.R.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 S.W.2d 719, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-worl-moctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack