State v. Workman, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Workman, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2001)

DecidedJuly 27, 2001

DocketNo. CA2001-03-055.

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Workman, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2001) (State v. Workman, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2001)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Workman, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2001), (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY This cause is an accelerated appeal from a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas denying the motion for postconviction relief of defendant-appellant, Timothy Scott Workman.¹

Appellant's assignments of error are overruled on the authority ofState v. Beaver (1998), 131 Ohio App.3d 458 and State v. Schulte (1997),118 Ohio App.3d 184. Specifically, the trial court correctly concluded that appellant's construed motion for postconviction relief was not timely filed. See id. Further, appellant failed to demonstrate that he meets the narrow requirements to file a delayed petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.23(A). Since the trial court correctly concluded that the petition was untimely, it was not necessary for the trial court to conduct any further inquiry into the petition's merits. See Beaver at 463-64.

Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and will not be published in any form. A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24.

__________________________________ William W. Young, Presiding Judge

James E. Walsh, Judge and Stephen W. Powell, Judge.

¹ Pursuant to Loc.R. 6(A), we have sua sponte assigned this appeal to the accelerated calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY This cause is an accelerated appeal from a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas denying the motion for postconviction relief of defendant-appellant, Timothy Scott Workman.¹

Appellant's assignments of error are overruled on the authority ofState v. Beaver (1998), 131 Ohio App.3d 458 and State v. Schulte (1997),118 Ohio App.3d 184. Specifically, the trial court correctly concluded that appellant's construed motion for postconviction relief was not timely filed. See id. Further, appellant failed to demonstrate that he meets the narrow requirements to file a delayed petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.23(A). Since the trial court correctly concluded that the petition was untimely, it was not necessary for the trial court to conduct any further inquiry into the petition's merits. See Beaver at 463-64.

Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and will not be published in any form. A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24.

__________________________________ William W. Young, Presiding Judge

James E. Walsh, Judge and Stephen W. Powell, Judge.

¹ Pursuant to Loc.R. 6(A), we have sua sponte assigned this appeal to the accelerated calendar.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Workman, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2001), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-workman-unpublished-decision-7-27-2001-ohioctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack