State v. Woody

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Lamont Woody, Appellant.

---

Appeal From York County
 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-535
Submitted September 2, 2008 – Filed September 16, 2008   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Woody appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation because there was insufficient evidence to support a finding he substantially violated the conditions of his probation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Woody’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.