State v. Woodward

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Woodward

895 S.W.2d 264, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 473, 1995 WL 106570

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 1995·No. No. 64649·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his convictions by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, possession of less than thirty-five grams of marijuana and driving while intoxicated. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of ten years for the possession of a controlled substance conviction, one year for the possession of marijuana conviction and six months for the D.W.I. conviction. The single claim of error the trial court erred in not declaring, sua sponte, a mistrial is without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his convictions by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, possession of less than thirty-five grams of marijuana and driving while intoxicated. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of ten years for the possession of a controlled substance conviction, one year for the possession of marijuana conviction and six months for the D.W.I. conviction. The single claim of error the trial court erred in not declaring, sua sponte, a mistrial is without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Woodward, 895 S.W.2d 264, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 473, 1995 WL 106570 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 264 (State v. Woodward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related