State v. Woods

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Woods. Read the opinion of the Court — 376 S.C. 125
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided January 10, 2008·No. 2008-UP-016·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Marcus Antonio Woods, Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
John L. Breeden, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-016
Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January 10, 2008   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; Solicitor Warren B. Geise, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Marcus Antonio Woods appeals his guilty pleas and sentence of fourteen years imprisonment for second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor and resisting arrest, arguing the plea court failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), in accepting his plea. After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Woods’ pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Woods’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF AND PIEPER, JJ., AND GOOLSBY, A.J., CONCUR.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Woods, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

State v. Woods (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)