State v. Woods

238 S.W.3d 731, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565, 2007 WL 3342103
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 2007·No. ED 89027·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jasper Woods (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree and one count of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erroneously admitted certain evidence at trial, and the court erred in granting the state’s motion to strike two members of the venire panel for cause.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Woods, 238 S.W.3d 731, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1565, 2007 WL 3342103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

238 S.W.3d 731 (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LEINE v. Baker
238 S.W.3d 731 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)