State v. Woods

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Woods

600 So. 2d 592, 1992 La. LEXIS 1921, 1992 WL 142781

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Woods. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 La. LEXIS 424 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 4, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-1564·Published

Opinion

In re Woods, Eddie; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 267-828.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of multiple offender hearing transcript he has filed on or about March 15, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Woods, Eddie; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 267-828.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of multiple offender hearing transcript he has filed on or about March 15, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State v. Woods, 600 So. 2d 592, 1992 La. LEXIS 1921, 1992 WL 142781 (La. 1992).

Pincite

600 So. 2d 592 (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.