State v. Woodland
This text of 2014 Ohio 4477 (State v. Woodland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Woodland, 2014-Ohio-4477.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101118
STATE OF OHIO
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
vs.
DAESHAYVONNE WOODLAND DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED
Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-13-578335-B
BEFORE: Stewart, J., McCormack, P.J., and E.T. Gallagher, J.
RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: October 9, 2014 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
Rick L. Ferrara 2077 East 4th Street, Second Floor Cleveland, OH 44114
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: Fallon Radigan Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street, 9th Floor Cleveland, OH 44113 MELODY J. STEWART, J.:
{¶1} Defendant-appellant Daeshayvonne Woodland pleaded guilty to one count of
murder with a firearm specification. During sentencing, the court stated “I’ll waive fines
and costs.” The sentencing entry, however, stated “the court hereby enters judgment
against the defendant in an amount equal to the costs of this prosecution.” Woodland’s
sole assignment of error on appeal is that the court erred by issuing a sentencing entry
requiring her to pay court costs.
{¶2} The state concedes that the sentencing entry requiring Woodland to pay court
costs was a clerical error. We agree. The sentencing transcript makes it clear that the
court intended to waive costs. We therefore sustain the assignment of error and remand
with instructions for the court to issue a nunc pro tunc entry to make the sentencing entry
reflect what occurred during sentencing. See State v. Qualls, 131 Ohio St.3d 499,
2012-Ohio-1111, 967 N.E.2d 718, ¶ 13.
{¶3} This cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion.
It is ordered that appellant recover of appellee her costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Cuyahoga
County Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of
Appellate Procedure.
________________________________________ MELODY J. STEWART, JUDGE
TIM McCORMACK, P.J., and EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 4477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-woodland-ohioctapp-2014.