State v. Woodin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Woodin

842 P.2d 800, 116 Or. App. 383, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2050

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 12, 1992·No. 88C-22187, 90C-21461; CA A71142, A71143·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and reversal of his probation revocation. His argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress does not require discussion. He is correct that the court erred in sentencing him on the burglary conviction to a maximum term under ORS 137.615 that exceeded the sentencing guidelines. State v. Haydon, 113 Or App 205, 832 P2d 457, on recon 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992).

Remanded for resentencing on conviction for burglary in the first degree; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and reversal of his probation revocation. His argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress does not require discussion. He is correct that the court erred in sentencing him on the burglary conviction to a maximum term under ORS 137.615 that exceeded the sentencing guidelines. State v. Haydon, 113 Or App 205, 832 P2d 457, on recon 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992).

Remanded for resentencing on conviction for burglary in the first degree; otherwise affirmed.

State v. Woodin, 842 P.2d 800, 116 Or. App. 383, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2050 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

842 P.2d 800 (State v. Woodin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related