State v. . Woodfin
This text of 87 N.C. 526 (State v. . Woodfin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts of the case are not set forth in the statement made up by His Honor, and we are left to infer what they were from the special instructions asked by the defendant, and the charge to the jury.
From these we infer the defendant went hunting with a pistol in his pocket, or concealed about his person. If so he was clearly guilty of a violation of the statute.
*527 There is no error in the refusal of the court to give the instructions asked ; and while we think he laid down the law somewhat too broadly in his charge to the jury, yet so far as it applied to the supposed facts of the case, it ivas not erroneous.
No error. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 N.C. 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-woodfin-nc-1882.