State v. Woodard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Woodard

851 S.W.2d 56, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 493, 1993 WL 97699

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 1993·No. No. WD 46159·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

From convictions of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1986, and two counts forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo. Cum. Supp. 1991 with twenty year sentences on each to run concurrently the defendant appeals with three points: 1) spectator misconduct, 2) failure to suppress the victim’s identification of defendant, and 3) instructional error on definition of reasonable doubt. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

From convictions of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1986, and two counts forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo. Cum. Supp. 1991 with twenty year sentences on each to run concurrently the defendant appeals with three points: 1) spectator misconduct, 2) failure to suppress the victim’s identification of defendant, and 3) instructional error on definition of reasonable doubt. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Woodard, 851 S.W.2d 56, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 493, 1993 WL 97699 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

851 S.W.2d 56 (State v. Woodard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.