State v. Wood

412 P.2d 779, 68 Wash. 2d 303, 1966 Wash. LEXIS 737
Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1966·No. 38282·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Sitting without a jury, the trial court found the defendant guilty of furnishing liquor to a minor and of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Defendant appeals.

There are neither findings of fact nor conclusions of law in the record as required by Rule of Pleading, Practice and Procedure 52.04W, RCW vol. O. It is the duty of the attorneys to see that a proper judgment and sentence is entered. The findings of fact and conclusions of law may *304 be submitted, any time while the appeal is pending. See Rule of Pleading, Practice and. Procedure 60, RCW vol. O. This was not done. We are required to remand the case for the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. State v. Helsel, 61 Wn.2d 81, 377 P.2d 408 (1962); and Seattle v. Silverman, 35 Wn.2d 574, 214 P.2d 180 (1950).

Judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law with proper judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wood, 412 P.2d 779, 68 Wash. 2d 303, 1966 Wash. LEXIS 737 (Wash. 1966).

412 P.2d 779 (State v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs. v. Sims
441 P.3d 262 (Washington Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. Head
964 P.2d 1187 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. McGary
683 P.2d 1125 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1984)
State v. State Credit Ass'n
657 P.2d 327 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1983)
State v. Edwards
477 P.2d 28 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1970)
State v. Lounsbery
445 P.2d 1017 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Wilks
424 P.2d 663 (Washington Supreme Court, 1967)