State v. Wonser

321 Or. App. 540
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 31, 2022
DocketA174980
StatusUnpublished

This text of 321 Or. App. 540 (State v. Wonser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wonser, 321 Or. App. 540 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Submitted July 29, affirmed August 31, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MATTHEW ROMAN WONSER, aka Matthew Roman Drakeford Wonser, Defendant-Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 19CR34546; A174980

Amanda R. Benjamin, Judge pro tempore. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Daniel C. Bennett, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Rusen, 369 Or 677, 509 P3d 628 (2022); State v. Davis-McCoy, 300 Or App 326, 454 P3d 48 (2019).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Davis-McCoy
454 P.3d 48 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)
State v. Rusen
509 P.3d 628 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
321 Or. App. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wonser-orctapp-2022.