State v. Wong

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Wong

406 P.2d 772, 67 Wash. 2d 996, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 729

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 21, 1965

DocketNo. 37526

StatusPublished

This text of 406 P.2d 772 (State v. Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wong, 406 P.2d 772, 67 Wash. 2d 996, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 729 (Wash. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

— This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court dismissing a writ of certiorari obtained by the city of Seattle for the review of á judgment of the Seattle Municipal Court, wherein certain charges filed against Daniel F. Sullivan, defendant, for the violation of the zoning ordinance of Seattle (ordinance 86300) were dismissed.

We have carefully considered the entire record on appeal to this court and find it inadequate to review the trial court’s judgment in its dismissal of the writ of certiorari.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

— This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court dismissing a writ of certiorari obtained by the city of Seattle for the review of á judgment of the Seattle Municipal Court, wherein certain charges filed against Daniel F. Sullivan, defendant, for the violation of the zoning ordinance of Seattle (ordinance 86300) were dismissed.

We have carefully considered the entire record on appeal to this court and find it inadequate to review the trial court’s judgment in its dismissal of the writ of certiorari.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

406 P.2d 772, 67 Wash. 2d 996, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wong-wash-1965.