State v. Wollen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wollen

169 S.W.3d 556, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2005 WL 1949900

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 16, 2005

DocketWD 64341

StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.W.3d 556 (State v. Wollen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wollen, 169 S.W.3d 556, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2005 WL 1949900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Randy J. Wollen appeals from his conviction by a jury of second-degree statutory sodomy in violation of section 566.064, RSMo 2000. At trial, Wollen raised the affirmative defense under section 566.020.3, RSMo 2000, that he reasonably believed the victim to be seventeen years of age or older. On appeal, Wollen claims that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State’s objections to his questioning of several witnesses regarding whether the victim looked “more mature” than her actual age.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Randy J. Wollen appeals from his conviction by a jury of second-degree statutory sodomy in violation of section 566.064, RSMo 2000. At trial, Wollen raised the affirmative defense under section 566.020.3, RSMo 2000, that he reasonably believed the victim to be seventeen years of age or older. On appeal, Wollen claims that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State’s objections to his questioning of several witnesses regarding whether the victim looked “more mature” than her actual age.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.W.3d 556, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2005 WL 1949900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wollen-moctapp-2005.