State v. Wollen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wollen

169 S.W.3d 556, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2005 WL 1949900

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2005·No. WD 64341·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Randy J. Wollen appeals from his conviction by a jury of second-degree statutory sodomy in violation of section 566.064, RSMo 2000. At trial, Wollen raised the affirmative defense under section 566.020.3, RSMo 2000, that he reasonably believed the victim to be seventeen years of age or older. On appeal, Wollen claims that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State’s objections to his questioning of several witnesses regarding whether the victim looked “more mature” than her actual age.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Randy J. Wollen appeals from his conviction by a jury of second-degree statutory sodomy in violation of section 566.064, RSMo 2000. At trial, Wollen raised the affirmative defense under section 566.020.3, RSMo 2000, that he reasonably believed the victim to be seventeen years of age or older. On appeal, Wollen claims that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State’s objections to his questioning of several witnesses regarding whether the victim looked “more mature” than her actual age.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Wollen, 169 S.W.3d 556, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2005 WL 1949900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

169 S.W.3d 556 (State v. Wollen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.