State v. Wolfe

596 P.2d 1322, 41 Or. App. 79, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2742
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 2, 1979
DocketNo. 107,610, CA 13215
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 596 P.2d 1322 (State v. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wolfe, 596 P.2d 1322, 41 Or. App. 79, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2742 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

ROBERTS, J.

Defendant was found guilty by the trial judge of the crime of possession of a weapon by an inmate of a penal institution, ORS 166.275, 1 on stipulated facts and sentenced to five years imprisonment. He seeks remand for judgment of conviction for a violation and resentencing. Defendant contends he can only be convicted for a violation which cannot carry a prison term because ORS 166.275 is outside the criminal code and it neither requires a culpable mental state nor evidences a clear legislative intent to dispense with the requirement of a culpable mental state. ORS 161.105(1) and (2).2 State v. Eyerly, 37 Or App 399, 587 P2d 1039 (1978); State v. Pierre, 30 Or App 81, 566 P2d 534 (1977).

We need not reach defendant’s contention that ORS 166.275 can only provide for a violation, however, [82]*82because this case falls within the provisions of ORS 161.105(3) which states:

"(3) Although an offense defined by a statute outside the Oregon Criminal Code requires no culpable mental state with respect to one or more of its material elements, the culpable commission of the offense may be alleged and proved, in which case criminal negligence constitutes sufficient culpability, and the classification of the offense and the authorized sentence shall be determined by ORS 161.505 to 161.655. [General provisions for classification of and penalties for criminal offenses].” (Emphasis supplied.)

Even if ORS 166.275, as contended by defendant, requires no culpable mental state, the indictment in this case charged defendant with "knowingly” possessing the weapon and the stipulated evidence was more than sufficient to prove his knowledge. Therefore, the trial court did not err in sentencing defendant to a prison term.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Portland v. Potts
799 P.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)
City of Portland v. Peterson
639 P.2d 638 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
State v. Wolfe
605 P.2d 1185 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 P.2d 1322, 41 Or. App. 79, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wolfe-orctapp-1979.