State v. Wolfe

281 S.W.3d 360, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 566, 2009 WL 1117431
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 2009·No. WD 69377·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Wolfe appeals her conviction of stealing over $500, § 570.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2008, on the basis that there was insufficient evidence presented by the State at trial to support her conviction. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wolfe, 281 S.W.3d 360, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 566, 2009 WL 1117431 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

281 S.W.3d 360 (State v. Wolfe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farris v. State
281 S.W.3d 360 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)