State v. Wolfe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Wolfe

272 So. 2d 833, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7429

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 1973

DocketNo. 70-1168

StatusPublished

This text of 272 So. 2d 833 (State v. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wolfe, 272 So. 2d 833, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7429 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on June 22, 1971 (249 So.2d 736) reversing the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed December 20, 1972 (271 So.2d 130) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for reinstatement of the trial court’s discharge of the petitioner,

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued on July IS, 1971 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed June 22, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment of the trial court appealed from is reinstated and the petitioner shall stand discharged as ordered. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on June 22, 1971 (249 So.2d 736) reversing the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed December 20, 1972 (271 So.2d 130) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for reinstatement of the trial court’s discharge of the petitioner,

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued on July IS, 1971 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed June 22, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment of the trial court appealed from is reinstated and the petitioner shall stand discharged as ordered. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 So. 2d 833, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wolfe-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack