State v. Wolf, 2007-L-101 (10-15-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Wolf, 2007-L-101 (10-15-2007)

2007 Ohio 5502

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 15, 2007

DocketNos. 2007-L-101 and 2007-L-102.

StatusPublished

This text of 2007 Ohio 5502 (State v. Wolf, 2007-L-101 (10-15-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wolf, 2007-L-101 (10-15-2007), 2007 Ohio 5502 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION {¶ 1} On June 25, 2007, appellant, David A. Wolf, filed his notices of appeal from May 23, 2007 judgments issued by the Lake County Court of Common Pleas denying his post conviction motion to correct and/or modify an improper and unconstitutional sentence and his motion to compel a hearing on the state's motion to *Page 2 declare him a sexual predator. Thus, appellant's notices of appeal were filed thirty-three days after the judgments had been issued by the trial court.

{¶ 2} App.R. 4(A) states:

{¶ 3} "A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day rule period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."

{¶ 4} Appellant's notices of appeal were due to be filed by June 22, 2007, and were not filed until June 25, 2007.

{¶ 5} Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the present appeals.

{¶ 6} Appeals dismissed pursuant to App.R. 4(A).

COLLEEN MARY OTOOLE, J., TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J., concur.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION {¶ 1} On June 25, 2007, appellant, David A. Wolf, filed his notices of appeal from May 23, 2007 judgments issued by the Lake County Court of Common Pleas denying his post conviction motion to correct and/or modify an improper and unconstitutional sentence and his motion to compel a hearing on the state's motion to *Page 2 declare him a sexual predator. Thus, appellant's notices of appeal were filed thirty-three days after the judgments had been issued by the trial court.