Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Wogenstahl

State v. Wogenstahl

648 N.E.2d 1373, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wogenstahl. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 Ohio St. 3d 344 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 1995·No. 95-42; No. C-930222·Published

Opinion

On pro se motion for leave to file pro se brief, and on motion for stay of execution pending court of appeals’ decision on application for reopening by appellant pro se. Motions denied.

Douglas, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wogenstahl, 648 N.E.2d 1373, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3590 (Ohio 1995).

648 N.E.2d 1373 (State v. Wogenstahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.