State v. W.K.

929 So. 2d 1095, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6601, 2006 WL 1154952
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 2006·No. No. 4D05-3216·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The state failed to preserve its claim that the disposition was illegal by a proper objection at sentencing or by a

[1096]*1096motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135.

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. W.K., 929 So. 2d 1095, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6601, 2006 WL 1154952 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 1095 (State v. W.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.