Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State v. W.J. Austin

State v. W.J. Austin

107 So. 126, 160 La. 324, 1926 La. LEXIS 2365
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 4, 1926
DocketNo. 27441.
StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 126 (State v. W.J. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. W.J. Austin, 107 So. 126, 160 La. 324, 1926 La. LEXIS 2365 (La. 1926).

Opinion

O’NIELL, O. J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. The only question propounded is whether he was entitled to be informed, in response to a motion for a bill of particulars, of the name or identity of the person alleged tOohave bought the liquor, provided he was a nonresident or stranger in the parish, or was biased or prejudiced against, or an enemy of the defendant. The question was answered in the negative in the case of State v. Hebert (No. 27442) 107 So. 123, 1 decided to-day. For the reasons given in that ease,

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 316.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hebert
107 So. 123 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 So. 126, 160 La. 324, 1926 La. LEXIS 2365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wj-austin-la-1926.