State v. W.J. Austin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. W.J. Austin

107 So. 126, 160 La. 324, 1926 La. LEXIS 2365

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 4, 1926·No. No. 27441.·Published

Opinion

O’NIELL, O. J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. The only question propounded is whether he was entitled to be informed, in response to a motion for a bill of particulars, of the name or identity of the person alleged tOohave bought the liquor, provided he was a nonresident or stranger in the parish, or was biased or prejudiced against, or an enemy of the defendant. The question was answered in the negative in the case of State v. Hebert (No. 27442) 107 So. 123, 1 decided to-day. For the reasons given in that ease,

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 316.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, O. J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. The only question propounded is whether he was entitled to be informed, in response to a motion for a bill of particulars, of the name or identity of the person alleged tOohave bought the liquor, provided he was a nonresident or stranger in the parish, or was biased or prejudiced against, or an enemy of the defendant. The question was answered in the negative in the case of State v. Hebert (No. 27442) 107 So. 123, 1 decided to-day. For the reasons given in that ease,

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 316.

State v. W.J. Austin, 107 So. 126, 160 La. 324, 1926 La. LEXIS 2365 (La. 1926).

Pincite

107 So. 126 (State v. W.J. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related