State v. Wisner

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Wisner

97 P. 1135, 36 Mont. 621, 1907 Mont. LEXIS 48

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 28, 1907

DocketNo. 2,504

StatusPublished

This text of 97 P. 1135 (State v. Wisner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wisner, 97 P. 1135, 36 Mont. 621, 1907 Mont. LEXIS 48 (Mo. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court being advised by the attorney general that the judgment appealed from in the above-entitled action is based upon the information considered by this court in In re Wisner, 36 Mont. 298, 92 Pac. 958, and that the sufficiency of said information is raised in said appeal, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial be and the same are hereby reversed, upon the authority of In re Wisner, supra. [622]*622and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the information; all other questions raised in said appeal being reserved.

Messrs. Rodgers & Rodgers, and Mr. J. H. Duffy, for Appellant. Mr. Albert J. Galen, Attorney General, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court being advised by the attorney general that the judgment appealed from in the above-entitled action is based upon the information considered by this court in In re Wisner, 36 Mont. 298, 92 Pac. 958, and that the sufficiency of said information is raised in said appeal, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial be and the same are hereby reversed, upon the authority of In re Wisner, supra. [622]*622and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the information; all other questions raised in said appeal being reserved.

Messrs. Rodgers & Rodgers, and Mr. J. H. Duffy, for Appellant. Mr. Albert J. Galen, Attorney General, for Respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 P. 1135, 36 Mont. 621, 1907 Mont. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wisner-mont-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack