State v. Wishhart

738 So. 2d 1004, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10120, 1999 WL 550679
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 1999·No. No. 98-02845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The State challenges the circuit court’s decision to impose a downward departure sentence after Richard Wishhart pleaded guilty to felony and misdemeanor charges. We note that the court never really stated any reasons for the departure, either on the record at the hearing or in its written order. While we may affirm a downward departure sentence when the court fails to enter written reasons but has announced valid reasons at sentencing, we must reverse when it gives no reasons at all. Cf. Pease v. State, 712 So.2d 374 (Fla.1997).

Wishhart has suggested several hypotheses to explain why the court might have decided to depart from the guidelines. We have reviewed his suggestions and find them to have no merit. We reverse and remand for resentencing pursuant to the guidelines.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wishhart, 738 So. 2d 1004, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10120, 1999 WL 550679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

738 So. 2d 1004 (State v. Wishhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Teal
831 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)