State v. . Wiseman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Wiseman

63 N.C. 536

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1869·Published

Opinion

*537 PeaRSON, C. J.

The alteration made in the record by the consent of the defendant answered every purpose that could have been effected by the certiorari, and we are at a loss to see what more the Solicitor for the State expected or desired. We are not at liberty to suppose that the object was to gain a continuance.

At all events the appeal was improvidently allowed by his Honor. Let it be dismissed.

* Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*537 PeaRSON, C. J.

The alteration made in the record by the consent of the defendant answered every purpose that could have been effected by the certiorari, and we are at a loss to see what more the Solicitor for the State expected or desired. We are not at liberty to suppose that the object was to gain a continuance.

At all events the appeal was improvidently allowed by his Honor. Let it be dismissed.

* Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed.

State v. . Wiseman, 63 N.C. 536 (N.C. 1869).

Pincite

63 N.C. 536 (State v. . Wiseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.