State v. Wise

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Wise

196 S.E.2d 293, 18 N.C. App. 151, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1808

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wise. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 N.C. App. 622 →

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided May 9, 1973·No. No. 733SC166·Published

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

The only exception in the record is to the judgment. Such an exception presents the face of the record for review. The record affirmatively shows that the defendant, represented by privately employed counsel, freely, understandingly, and voluntarily entered a plea of nolo contendere to a bill of indictment, proper in form, charging him with feloniously assaulting Jim Smith with a deadly weapon, to wit: a hammer, with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury. The prison sentence of eight to ten years is within the limits prescribed by statute for the offense charged. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEDRICK, Judge.

The only exception in the record is to the judgment. Such an exception presents the face of the record for review. The record affirmatively shows that the defendant, represented by privately employed counsel, freely, understandingly, and voluntarily entered a plea of nolo contendere to a bill of indictment, proper in form, charging him with feloniously assaulting Jim Smith with a deadly weapon, to wit: a hammer, with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury. The prison sentence of eight to ten years is within the limits prescribed by statute for the offense charged. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Vaughn concur.

State v. Wise, 196 S.E.2d 293, 18 N.C. App. 151, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1808 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

196 S.E.2d 293 (State v. Wise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.