State v. Winston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Winston

688 S.W.2d 384, 1985 Mo. App. LEXIS 3948

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Winston. Read the opinion of the Court — 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 4085 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 1985·No. No. 48583·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Fred Winston, appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, of illegal possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, to-wit, phencyclidine and illegal possession of a Schedule I controlled substance, to-wit, marijuana under thirty-five grams. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for five years on the Schedule II conviction and a concurrent term of imprisonment for one year on the Schedule I conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Fred Winston, appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, of illegal possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, to-wit, phencyclidine and illegal possession of a Schedule I controlled substance, to-wit, marijuana under thirty-five grams. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for five years on the Schedule II conviction and a concurrent term of imprisonment for one year on the Schedule I conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Winston, 688 S.W.2d 384, 1985 Mo. App. LEXIS 3948 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

688 S.W.2d 384 (State v. Winston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.