State v. Winningham

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Winningham

2012 Ohio 1998, 132 Ohio St. 3d 77

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 2012·No. 2012-0099·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for application of United States v. Jones, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *78 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melynda Machol, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Raymond L. Katz, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for application of United States v. Jones, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *78 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melynda Machol, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Raymond L. Katz, for appellant.

State v. Winningham, 2012 Ohio 1998, 132 Ohio St. 3d 77 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

2012 Ohio 1998 (State v. Winningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related