State v. Winningham

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Winningham

2012 Ohio 1998, 132 Ohio St. 3d 77

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 10, 2012

Docket2012-0099

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 2012 Ohio 1998 (State v. Winningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Winningham, 2012 Ohio 1998, 132 Ohio St. 3d 77 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for application of United States v. Jones, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *78 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melynda Machol, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Raymond L. Katz, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for application of United States v. Jones, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *78 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melynda Machol, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Raymond L. Katz, for appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2012 Ohio 1998, 132 Ohio St. 3d 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-winningham-ohio-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack