State v. Wingerter

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Wingerter

592 So. 2d 1291, 1992 La. LEXIS 660, 1992 WL 22073

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 3, 1992

DocketNo. 92-KH-0123

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 1291 (State v. Wingerter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wingerter, 592 So. 2d 1291, 1992 La. LEXIS 660, 1992 WL 22073 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Wingerter, William; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 256-439.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion requesting a copy of the initial police report he has filed on or about December 17, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wingerter, William; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 256-439.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion requesting a copy of the initial police report he has filed on or about December 17, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 1291, 1992 La. LEXIS 660, 1992 WL 22073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wingerter-la-1992.