State v. Windisch

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Windisch

204 S.W.3d 266, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1300, 2006 WL 2529537

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 5, 2006·No. No. ED 86467·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Windisch appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one [267] count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062, RSMo 2000, for which he was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Windisch appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one [267] count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062, RSMo 2000, for which he was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Windisch, 204 S.W.3d 266, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1300, 2006 WL 2529537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 266 (State v. Windisch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.