State v. Wilson
This text of State v. Wilson (State v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Willie Jerome Wilson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000576
Appeal From Richland County L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-138 Submitted March 1, 2021 – Filed April 28, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1
KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilson-scctapp-2021.