State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Wilson

530 S.E.2d 126, 339 S.C. 491, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 77

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 27, 2000

DocketNo. 25094

StatusPublished

This text of 530 S.E.2d 126 (State v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilson, 530 S.E.2d 126, 339 S.C. 491, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 77 (S.C. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

TOAL, Justice:

Appellant Pierre Wilson (“Defendant”) and Michael Martin were convicted of murder. Defendant has appealed. We reverse.

[492]*492The issues involved in this appeal are identical to those raised in State v. Martin, — S.C. --, — S.E.2d-, 2000 WL 760707, Op. No. 25093 (S.C.Sup.Ct. filed June 12, 2000) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 12 at 1). Based on the holding in that case, we REVERSE Defendant’s conviction.

FINNEY, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, and BURNETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOAL, Justice:

Appellant Pierre Wilson (“Defendant”) and Michael Martin were convicted of murder. Defendant has appealed. We reverse.

[492]*492The issues involved in this appeal are identical to those raised in State v. Martin, — S.C. --, — S.E.2d-, 2000 WL 760707, Op. No. 25093 (S.C.Sup.Ct. filed June 12, 2000) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 12 at 1). Based on the holding in that case, we REVERSE Defendant’s conviction.

FINNEY, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, and BURNETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 S.E.2d 126, 339 S.C. 491, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilson-sc-2000.