State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Wilson

530 S.E.2d 126, 339 S.C. 491, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 77

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 27, 2000·No. No. 25094·Published

Opinion

TOAL, Justice:

Appellant Pierre Wilson (“Defendant”) and Michael Martin were convicted of murder. Defendant has appealed. We reverse.

[492] The issues involved in this appeal are identical to those raised in State v. Martin, — S.C. --, — S.E.2d-, 2000 WL 760707, Op. No. 25093 (S.C.Sup.Ct. filed June 12, 2000) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 12 at 1). Based on the holding in that case, we REVERSE Defendant’s conviction.

FINNEY, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, and BURNETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOAL, Justice:

Appellant Pierre Wilson (“Defendant”) and Michael Martin were convicted of murder. Defendant has appealed. We reverse.

[492] The issues involved in this appeal are identical to those raised in State v. Martin, — S.C. --, — S.E.2d-, 2000 WL 760707, Op. No. 25093 (S.C.Sup.Ct. filed June 12, 2000) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 12 at 1). Based on the holding in that case, we REVERSE Defendant’s conviction.

FINNEY, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, and BURNETT, JJ., concur.

State v. Wilson, 530 S.E.2d 126, 339 S.C. 491, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 77 (S.C. 2000).

Pincite

530 S.E.2d 126 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.