State v. Wilson

385 P.3d 1233, 282 Or. App. 717, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1519
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 7, 2016
Docket12C49583, 14C44145; A159196 (Control), A159197
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 385 P.3d 1233 (State v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wilson, 385 P.3d 1233, 282 Or. App. 717, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1519 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated appeals, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm in Case No. 14C44145 and a judgment revoking his probation in Case No. 12C49583. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion in Case No. 14C44145 and its revocation of his probation in Case No. 12C49583 based on the conviction in Case No. 14C44145.

In Case No. 14C44145, defendant moved to suppress evidence that an Oregon State Police trooper discovered during a traffic stop, which led to the charge of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270.1 After the trial court denied the motion, defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty to that charge, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s ruling on the suppression motion. See ORS 135.335(3). In Case No. 12C49583, defendant admitted to violating his probation based on his plea to the felon-in-possession charge in Case No. 14C44145, and the court revoked his probation. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s suppression motion and, consequently, that both judgments must be reversed and remanded. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cecconi
480 P.3d 953 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 P.3d 1233, 282 Or. App. 717, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilson-orctapp-2016.