State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Wilson

59 N.H. 139

DecidedJune 5, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 59 N.H. 139 (State v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilson, 59 N.H. 139 (N.H. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.

The indictment is sufficient. An intent to commit larceny is included in the charge of stealing. The charge of breaking and entering and stealing is equivalent to an averment of breaking and entering with intent to steal. Jones v. State, 11 N. H. 269; State v. Moore, 12 N. H. 42; State v. Ayer, 23 N. H. *140 301; Commonwealth v. Hope, 22 Pick. 1; Wharton Cr. Law 1613; 2 Bishop Cr. Law 115.

Demurrer overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.

The indictment is sufficient. An intent to commit larceny is included in the charge of stealing. The charge of breaking and entering and stealing is equivalent to an averment of breaking and entering with intent to steal. Jones v. State, 11 N. H. 269; State v. Moore, 12 N. H. 42; State v. Ayer, 23 N. H. *140 301; Commonwealth v. Hope, 22 Pick. 1; Wharton Cr. Law 1613; 2 Bishop Cr. Law 115.

Demurrer overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.H. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilson-nh-1879.