State v. Wilson
5 Nev. 43
Opinion
By the Court,
This appeal is very imperfectly presented — a matter to be [44]*44regretted in any case, particularly in one involving personal liberty. The transcript contains no bill of exceptions, and what therein purports to be a statement is neither certified by the District Judge, nor agreed to by the attorneys. There is nothing for the consideration of this Court but the indictment, the minutes of the District Court, and its instructions. As no error appears in either, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wilson, 5 Nev. 43 (Neb. 1869).
5 Nev. 43 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bronzo
30 Nev. 311 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1908)
Smith v. Wells Estate Co.
29 Nev. 411 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1907)
State v. Wallin
6 Nev. 280 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1871)