State v. Wilson

185 S.E.2d 4, 13 N.C. App. 260, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1228
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 N.C. App. 225
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1971·No. No. 713SC684·Published

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

With commendable candor, counsel assigned to perfect defendant’s appeal to this court states that he has read and examined the transcript and all other documents pertinent to this case but fails to find error. We too have carefully reviewed the record and perceive no error prejudicial to defendant.

No error.

Judges Brock and Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wilson, 185 S.E.2d 4, 13 N.C. App. 260, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1228 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

185 S.E.2d 4 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.